Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses public issues related to infrastructure and taxation, suggesting a policy solution based on historical tax rates. The tone is assertive and prescriptive, advocating for taxing the wealthy to fund public services. The accompanying image provides historical context to support the argument.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm and suggests a constructive solution to public issues, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing historical context and suggesting a specific policy solution, which can foster empathy and compassion for those who rely on public infrastructure. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by proposing a solution and providing evidence, rather than attacking individuals or groups. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for societal betterment by suggesting a policy change that could improve public infrastructure. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform responsibly by providing a reasoned argument supported by historical data. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.