In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
522d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the reliability and limitations of generative AI systems, particularly in the context of their consistency with reality. It addresses public concerns about the capabilities and potential pitfalls of AI technologies, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not cause harm and instead provides a critical perspective on the limitations of AI systems, which can be beneficial for public understanding. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the inconsistency of AI systems and their tendency to break when stretched beyond memorized data. This fosters a more informed and empathetic view of the technology's current state. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI systems without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the technology itself rather than individuals or groups. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.