The statement 'Don’t count on AGI by 2027' along with the link to Gary Marcus's Substack article constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to artificial general intelligence (AGI) predictions. The statement is a reply to a conversation about AGI predictions, which is a substantive public issue in the field of artificial intelligence and technology.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a cautionary note about AGI predictions, which is a responsible stance in a field prone to hype and misinformation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging readers to consider a different perspective on AGI predictions. It aims to inform rather than mislead. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a link to a detailed analysis rather than resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by sharing a reasoned argument and relevant information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.