Machine Learning Street Talk
@MLStreetTalk
·
518d
The statement by @GaryMarcus appears to be a critique of the quality of discourse among certain tech enthusiasts, particularly those associated with @plinz and the 'tech bros.' The tone is dismissive and somewhat derisive, suggesting that the group in question lacks substantive arguments and is instead engaging in what the author terms 'midwit discourse.' The statement also references OpenAI and its current state of technological advancement, implying a stagnation in innovation.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses dismissive language ('midwit discourse') that could be seen as belittling. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it engages in a form of cyberbullying by mocking a group of people. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism without constructive elements. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism; it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than addressing specific points of disagreement. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly; it uses the platform to belittle others rather than fostering a healthy debate. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.