In reply to:
Truth Seeker in Silicon Valley
@truth_in_sv
·
517d
The statement 'it’s a valid concern' in response to a discussion about the potential conflicts of interest in creating a new federal agency to regulate AI constitutes public discourse. It engages with a substantive issue related to regulatory practices and the influence of major industries on public policy.
- The statement does not cause harm and acknowledges a concern, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By validating the concern, the statement promotes understanding and empathy towards the issue raised. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages constructively without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a meaningful discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.