The statement and accompanying images constitute public discourse as they engage with the public issue of AI development and its societal impact. The statement by Gary Marcus critiques the current trajectory of OpenAI and calls for a return to its original mission to ensure AI is used for the greater good. This critique and call to action are relevant to ongoing debates about the ethical development and deployment of AI technologies.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for a positive change in the direction of AI development, aiming to mitigate potential negative impacts of AI. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the limitations of current AI technologies and urging a return to a mission that benefits society. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing specific concerns about OpenAI's direction and suggesting a course correction without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the influence of the speaker to advocate for the betterment of society by calling for ethical considerations in AI development. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.