Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
6/16/2024, 1:23:59 AM
X
In reply to:
Bill Hunt
@BillHuntBits
·
513d
@GaryMarcus @SilverHollowsz @WashburneAlex It seems to me that data and energy are the two critical limiting factors. Perhaps a third would be: available processors.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
513d
@SilverHollowsz @BillHuntBits @WashburneAlex Mostly on target except for one blunder:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
514d
@elonmusk @hiconcep @geoffreyhinton 1. Hinton actually makes a serious logical error: he says we know for sure that if we make LLMs bigger they will get better. We don't actually *know* that. It's been almost two years since GPT-4 was trained, nobody has been able to significantly outdo it. OpenAI recently…
Paula Chandler
@SilverHollowsz
·
513d
@BillHuntBits @WashburneAlex @GaryMarcus Your thoughts?
Bill Hunt
@BillHuntBits
·
513d
This is by far the smartest take on Artificial Intelligence (AI)—where it is, where it’s going, and how we should think about it—that I’ve seen yet. It’s 14 minutes very worth watching.
Jon Erlichman
@JonErlichman
·
514d
“There is a 50-50 chance AI will get more intelligent than humans in the next 20 years. We’ve never had to deal with things more intelligent than us. And we should be very uncertain about what it will look like.”

~ Geoffrey Hinton

The statement 'The number one factor is the architecture itself, which lacks coherent world models and the ability to check its own work.' is part of a broader conversation about the development and limitations of Artificial Intelligence (AI). This discussion involves public figures and experts in the field, addressing significant societal and technological issues. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a technical critique focused on AI architecture. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting a specific limitation in AI technology, which can foster informed discussions. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technology without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a critical issue in AI development. [+2]