Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47

Score 76

What I think many people don’t get is that the problems generative AI that we are seeing now aren’t new; they aren’t random. They are *persistent*, e.g., neural networks have NEVER been reliable at negation, NEVER been reliable at compositional structure, and NEVER been good at…

T J

@TJ09299872

513d

@iancc_wip @GaryMarcus GenAI is pretty good at synthesizing concepts with a vast amount of training and therefore latent representation, but it's also trivial to come up with examples they cannot produce

6/16/2024, 3:50:42 AM

The statement critiques the limitations of generative AI, particularly neural networks, in handling negation, compositional structure, and other tasks. It is part of a broader conversation about the capabilities and shortcomings of AI models, supported by examples and images demonstrating these issues.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not cause harm; it is a critique of technology rather than individuals or groups. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by highlighting specific, persistent issues with generative AI, encouraging a deeper look into the technology's limitations. [+2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technology, focusing on its limitations without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
By discussing the limitations of generative AI, the statement uses its platform to inform and potentially improve societal understanding of AI technology. [+2]