In reply to:
Tess Hegarty
@thegartsy
·
579d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the validity and relevance of the Turing Test as a benchmark for artificial general intelligence (AGI). It critiques the Turing Test and suggests an alternative goalpost for measuring AI progress, thus contributing to the public discourse on AI and its implications.
- The statement does not cause harm and instead contributes to a constructive debate about AI benchmarks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a critique and suggesting an alternative measure for AI progress. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the Turing Test without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to discuss an important issue in AI, potentially influencing public opinion and policy. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.