Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
6/17/2024, 2:41:15 PM
X
In reply to:
Tobi Olabode
@TobiOlabode3
·
509d
@davidad @GaryMarcus While unpopular, I do understand Yann LeCun's point LLMs is an off ramp to AGI.

Due to this.
davidad 🎇
@davidad
·
510d
When @GaryMarcus and others (including myself) say that LLMs do not “reason,” we mean something quite specific, but it’s hard to put one’s finger on it, until now. Specifically, Transformers do not
generalize
algebraic structures
out of distribution.
Gary Basin 🍍
@garybasin
·
510d
Why deep learning is ngmi in one graph

The statement is part of a substantive engagement with public issues related to artificial intelligence, specifically the capabilities and limitations of deep learning and large language models (LLMs). The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the technical aspects and future implications of AI technologies, which contributes to the civic dialogue on this topic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a technical discussion, thus adhering to the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by referencing a specific essay that discusses the limitations of deep learning, contributing to the broader conversation on AI. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a previous comment and adding to the discussion without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]