Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47

Score 76

@burny_tech That’s puzzling. My claim has never been to eliminate LLMs or deep learning, but to supplement them with other tools, with an argument very much like what you said. Where is the difference?

6/17/2024, 6:41:45 PM

In reply to:

Burny — Effective Omni

@burny_tech

509d

I strongly disagree with lots of your hate on deep learning and LLMs but we're synced on this one :D

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

509d

Exactly right, and what I have been trying to say:

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the capabilities and limitations of deep learning models and LLMs (Large Language Models), which are significant topics in the field of artificial intelligence and have broader societal implications.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not cause harm and seeks to clarify a misunderstanding, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by attempting to clarify the speaker's position and find common ground, which aligns with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a disagreement without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]