In reply to:
Sharon | AI wonders
@explorersofai
·
457d
The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of neurosymbolic AI, involving a discussion among several experts in the field. The tone is critical but not hostile, aiming to clarify a point of contention regarding a previous statement made by Yann LeCun. The intent is to engage in a constructive dialogue about the consistency of LeCun's views on neurosymbolic approaches.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive debate, thus adhering to the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by seeking clarification on a specific point, thus aligning with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without resorting to personal attacks, thus adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.