Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
457d
The statement critiques the current state of AI deployment and funding, using a sarcastic tone to highlight the disparity between media hype and practical application. It engages in public discourse by addressing the broader issue of AI technology's real-world effectiveness and the allocation of resources in the tech industry.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but its sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive of the efforts of those working in the field. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more critical and sarcastic. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the industry and its practices rather than individuals. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a significant issue in the tech industry, potentially prompting more thoughtful consideration of AI deployment and funding. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to responsibly critique industry practices. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.