Gary Marcus

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 29
6/18/2024, 3:30:58 AM
X
In reply to:
Nicholas
@NicholasorAI
·
456d
@GaryMarcus Every output of a generative language model is a “hallucination.” There is nothing true or false, just statistically structured hallucinations that are sometimes correct.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
458d
What I think many people don’t get is that the problems generative AI that we are seeing now aren’t new; they aren’t random. They are *persistent*, e.g., neural networks have NEVER been reliable at negation, NEVER been reliable at compositional structure, and NEVER been good at…
T J
@TJ09299872
·
458d
@iancc_wip @GaryMarcus GenAI is pretty good at synthesizing concepts with a vast amount of training and therefore latent representation, but it's also trivial to come up with examples they cannot produce

The statement 'Yes I have made that point from time to time' is a brief affirmation in response to a discussion about the limitations and characteristics of generative AI models. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the reliability and common sense understanding of generative AI models, with examples provided to illustrate the points being made.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is a neutral affirmation, thus upholding the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement is neutral and does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a constructive dialogue and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]