Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement expresses frustration over the alteration of an iconic piece of art from the film 'Full Metal Jacket,' specifically the removal of the phrase 'BORN TO KILL' from a helmet. The statement argues that this alteration misunderstands the original intent of the art, which is to highlight the 'duality of man.' The tone is critical and passionate, aiming to defend the integrity of the original artwork and its message.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a critique of an artistic decision.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the alteration of art rather than attacking individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the significance of the original artwork and its message about the 'duality of man.' [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the decision to alter the artwork, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.