Gary Marcus

Rank 24 of 47
|
Score 25
6/18/2024, 2:15:29 PM
X
In reply to:
AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️
@AISafetyMemes
·
455d
@GaryMarcus 1: Yes, but the trend is clear that more compute = smarter models. GPT4 is far more capable than a high school student in the ways that I care about.

I don't care that you can trick it with logic puzzles more often (which I'm not even entirely sure is true) or that it…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
455d
Soooo very wrong, in so many ways
1. That chart is make-believe, with wacky y-axes and totally hypothetical data. And no GPT-4 is not really a substitute for a smart high school student, c’mon.
2. Not much progress on raw capabilities since GPT-4 (trained Aug 2022, almost two…
AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️
@AISafetyMemes
·
455d
The same pundits have been saying "deep learning is hitting a wall" for a DECADE.

Why do they have ANY credibility left?

Wrong, wrong, wrong. Year after year after year.

Like all professional pundits, they pound their fist on the table and confidently declare AGI IS DEFINITELY…

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the integration of symbolic tools in AI and the issue of hallucinations in AI models. It addresses the technical challenges and the importance of these issues in the development of AI, contributing to the broader discourse on AI safety and capabilities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on technical issues and their implications rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by discussing the challenges of integrating symbolic tools and the importance of addressing hallucinations in AI models. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the technical issues and providing a reasoned argument without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]