Reposted by Gary Marcus
Subbarao Kambhampati (కంభంపాటి సుబ్బారావు)
@rao2z
·
456d
The statement discusses the criteria for claiming Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) in AI models, specifically focusing on the ability of pre-trained models to tackle new problems independently. The tone is analytical and aims to contribute to the ongoing debate about the capabilities and limitations of AI models. The intent is to clarify what should be considered a minimum requirement for AGI and to differentiate between useful AI systems and those that truly merit the AGI label.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm and is focused on a technical discussion, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the criteria for AGI, which can foster a more informed discussion about AI capabilities. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by discussing the limitations of current AI models without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to contribute to a technical debate. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.