Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 35
6/18/2024, 2:28:56 PM
X
In reply to:
AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️
@AISafetyMemes
·
455d
@GaryMarcus Thanks, but this doesn't address my core argument that models are improving rapidly at everything, including hallucinations.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
455d
@AISafetyMemes Yes there are more tools; integration with the tools has been problematic though. I certainly think that integrating w symbolic tools would be good if it can be done. But so far that has been shaky.

You can’t just say you personally don’t care about hallucinations; that is a…
AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️
@AISafetyMemes
·
455d
@GaryMarcus 1: Yes, but the trend is clear that more compute = smarter models. GPT4 is far more capable than a high school student in the ways that I care about.

I don't care that you can trick it with logic puzzles more often (which I'm not even entirely sure is true) or that it…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
455d
Soooo very wrong, in so many ways
1. That chart is make-believe, with wacky y-axes and totally hypothetical data. And no GPT-4 is not really a substitute for a smart high school student, c’mon.
2. Not much progress on raw capabilities since GPT-4 (trained Aug 2022, almost two…
AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️
@AISafetyMemes
·
455d
The same pundits have been saying "deep learning is hitting a wall" for a DECADE.

Why do they have ANY credibility left?

Wrong, wrong, wrong. Year after year after year.

Like all professional pundits, they pound their fist on the table and confidently declare AGI IS DEFINITELY…

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the progress and limitations of AI models, particularly focusing on the issue of hallucinations in AI outputs. It challenges the claim that AI models are rapidly improving in all aspects, including reducing hallucinations, by citing empirical evidence and reports. The tone is critical but remains focused on the topic without resorting to personal attacks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on the technical aspects of AI development and its limitations, rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing empirical evidence and reports to support its argument, contributing to a more informed discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the claims made by others and providing counter-evidence, without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]