Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 35
6/18/2024, 2:45:57 PM
X
In reply to:
Ben Feddersen
@SnoozeButtonBen
·
454d
@RobRoyce_ @GaryMarcus People were told that AI WAS magic. That it was as good or better than a human. Not autocomplete on steroids.
Rob Royce
@RobRoyce_
·
455d
@GaryMarcus That's true, but it's developer error when "made up features" get through to end users. There are plenty of ways to mitigate hallucinations, it's just more work than most people want to do. They all want AI to just work magically.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
455d
It’s taken awhile, but more and more people are seeing it: LLMs simply cannot be trusted.

The statement 'I coined the phrase autocomplete on steroids and tried to warn people 🤷‍♂️' is part of a broader discussion about the limitations and misconceptions surrounding AI, particularly large language models (LLMs). The tone is somewhat defensive and self-justifying, as the user claims to have foreseen the issues being discussed. The intent appears to be to highlight their prior warnings about AI capabilities and to assert their foresight in the matter.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm directly but could be seen as dismissive of others' concerns by focusing on self-justification rather than contributing constructively to the discussion. Minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Adheres. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on self-justification. Minor violation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it also does not contribute constructively to the dialogue. Neutral.