Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
The statement questions the allocation of government resources, highlighting a perceived discrepancy between military spending and social welfare spending. It is a critique of public policy and thus constitutes public discourse. The tone is critical and seeks to provoke thought and discussion on government priorities.
- The statement does not directly harm anyone with words or actions. It critiques policy rather than individuals, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting the needs of people for health care, housing, and food. It encourages a re-evaluation of priorities to foster compassion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of government policy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on systemic issues rather than individual failings. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By questioning government spending priorities, the statement uses its influence to advocate for societal betterment, particularly in terms of social welfare. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss important public issues with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.