In reply to:
D
@pleasech1ll
·
127d
JustinBGreen
@JustinBGreen1
·
129d
Free & Equal Elections
@FreeandEqual
·
130d
The statement and the linked content engage in public discourse by discussing the political affiliations and actions of public figures, specifically addressing allegations against Jill Stein and her visit to Russia. The conversation involves multiple public figures and touches on significant political issues, including foreign influence in U.S. politics and the upcoming presidential debate.
- The statement 'Jill Stein is a Russian asset and a traitor' is a serious accusation that could cause harm if unsubstantiated. The response 'Untrue' attempts to counter this claim, but the overall discourse could still be harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The initial accusation against Jill Stein does not respect her privacy and dignity, as it labels her a traitor without providing substantial evidence. The response 'Untrue' attempts to defend her, but the discourse remains contentious. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement 'Untrue' and the linked video aim to promote understanding by providing Jill Stein's perspective on her visit to Russia. However, the initial accusation and the overall tone of the conversation are not conducive to empathy and compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The conversation includes personal attacks, such as calling Jill Stein a traitor, which detracts from constructive criticism and dialogue. The response 'Untrue' attempts to engage in dialogue, but the initial statement is a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.