Jill Stien

The statement and accompanying images suggest that major social media platforms are intentionally restricting the accounts of Green Party affiliates, implying a broader agenda controlled by wealthy individuals. The tone is accusatory and conspiratorial, suggesting a deliberate suppression of political voices. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses concerns about freedom of speech, political bias, and the influence of wealth on information dissemination.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims and fostering distrust in social media platforms. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it makes broad accusations without specific evidence. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but rather fuels division and suspicion. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, but rather makes sweeping accusations. [-2]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a perceived issue, but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or based on verified information.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech by expressing concerns about censorship, but it does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive.