The statement addresses a public issue related to governance and the concept of the 'deep state,' which makes it part of public discourse. The tone suggests a call to action or a critique of current governance structures, implying that elected officials are not the ones truly in control.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as contributing to a divisive narrative, which might indirectly cause harm by fostering distrust in government institutions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and it respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it promotes a divisive viewpoint without offering constructive solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad assertion without engaging with differing viewpoints or providing evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a specific viewpoint about governance, but it does not clearly contribute to the betterment of society as it lacks constructive elements. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it promotes a potentially divisive and unsubstantiated claim. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.