Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement engages with a substantive public issue, specifically the viability and implications of a third political party in the American political landscape. It raises questions about historical precedents, current circumstances, and comparative political systems, which are all relevant to civic dialogue.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions as it neutrally poses questions for consideration. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging exploration of different political systems and their benefits and drawbacks. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites constructive dialogue by asking questions rather than making personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to encourage thoughtful consideration of political structures, which can contribute to the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly by fostering a reasoned discussion. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.