Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 115
6/18/2024, 11:09:15 PM
X
In reply to:
Julian
@mealreplacer
·
453d
@GaryMarcus @ethanCaballero @fchollet @geoffreyhinton Not quite its “death”, but you did famously say that deep learning is hitting a wall in March 2022. It seems to me as though we’ve seen significant progress in AI from deep learning since March 2022
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
453d
@ethanCaballero @fchollet @geoffreyhinton Neither of us actually said that, but aren’t you the guy who said scale is all we need? Not looking like such a healthy idea these days, tbh.
Ethan Caballero is busy
@ethanCaballero
·
453d
Reports today of Deep Learning's death (in @GaryMarcus and @fchollet, since taken down) were greatly exaggerated. I have confirmation from @geoffreyhinton, her husband, that she is alive and well.

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about the progress and challenges of deep learning, a significant topic in the field of artificial intelligence. The tone is somewhat defensive and corrective, aiming to clarify previous statements and provide an update on the state of deep learning.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is focused on providing factual information and a link to a detailed analysis. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by providing a link to a detailed analysis, although it could be more empathetic in tone. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the claims made in the conversation. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement implicitly acknowledges the need to correct misunderstandings about previous statements, although it does not explicitly acknowledge any mistakes.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a meaningful debate on a public issue. [+1]