In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
398d
The statement critiques U.S. support for Israel, particularly in relation to Netanyahu's war plans, and suggests that this support has been harmful to both Israelis and Palestinians. The tone is critical and the intent is to highlight perceived policy errors and their consequences.
- The statement aims to highlight harm caused by U.S. policy, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the dignity of those involved. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by discussing the consequences of policy decisions, though it could be more empathetic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of U.S. policy and Netanyahu's actions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a change in policy, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.