In reply to:
The statement by @matthewstoller, quoting Mahatma Gandhi, engages in a critique of the field of economics and its perceived scientific validity. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses a substantive issue related to the nature of economics and its impact on society.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it is critical of a field of study, which could be seen as indirectly harmful to those who practice it. However, it does not use harmful language.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a critique of an idea rather than an attack on individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is a strong critique that could be seen as dismissive rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a strong, negative assertion without offering a path for constructive engagement or discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a critical viewpoint. However, the responsibility and integrity of the statement could be questioned due to its harsh tone. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.