The statement uses a strong metaphor to criticize the practices of AI companies, particularly in relation to the use of creative professionals' work without proper compensation or consent. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived ethical and legal transgressions by comparing them to theft and burglary. The intent is to draw attention to the issue and advocate for the rights of creative professionals.
- The statement aims to do no harm to individuals but is critical of corporate practices, which can be seen as a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals but is harsh on corporate entities, which is generally acceptable in public discourse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy for creative professionals who feel their work has been exploited. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI companies' practices without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for the betterment of society by highlighting ethical concerns in AI development. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.