Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the current state of AI development, highlighting the redundancy and flaws in the efforts of major AI companies. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and critical, aiming to provoke thought about the efficiency and innovation in the AI industry.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critique of industry practices rather than individuals, so it aligns with this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by pointing out the redundancy and flaws in AI development, encouraging a deeper look into the industry's practices. However, it lacks empathy and compassion, focusing more on criticism.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the AI industry without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By critiquing the AI industry's practices, the statement uses influence to potentially drive betterment in the field, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue, adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.