Gary Marcus

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -1
6/20/2024, 2:50:10 PM
X
In reply to:
e/acc
@tahagngr86
·
152d
@GaryMarcus Ok boomer!
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
152d
Claude 3.5 Sonnet hot take: Yet another model, roughly in same ballpark as many others.

The field spent over $50B last year trying to decisively beat GPT-4, but so far what see evidence for is convergence, rather than continued exponential growth.
Aravind Srinivas
@AravSrinivas
·
152d
That was quick!

The statement 'Ok scientific illiterate who wants to accelerate but doesn’t understand how to fit a curve' is a response to a dismissive comment ('Ok boomer!') and is part of a broader discussion on the performance of AI models. The tone of the statement is confrontational and dismissive, and it includes a personal attack. This does not contribute constructively to the public discourse on the topic of AI model performance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions by using a derogatory term ('scientific illiterate'). [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others and engages in a form of cyberbullying by calling someone 'scientific illiterate.' [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and instead resorts to a personal attack. [-2]