Gary Marcus

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -1
6/20/2024, 3:02:26 PM
X
In reply to:
e/acc
@tahagngr86
·
152d
@GaryMarcus Is your bet still on? I remember you were interested in like a 100 grand bet for AGI until 2026 or something? I'm in if you are...
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
152d
@tahagngr86 Ok scientific illiterate who wants to accelerate but doesn’t understand how to fit a curve
e/acc
@tahagngr86
·
152d
@GaryMarcus Ok boomer!
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
152d
Claude 3.5 Sonnet hot take: Yet another model, roughly in same ballpark as many others.

The field spent over $50B last year trying to decisively beat GPT-4, but so far what see evidence for is convergence, rather than continued exponential growth.
Aravind Srinivas
@AravSrinivas
·
152d
That was quick!

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about artificial general intelligence (AGI) and accountability in scientific predictions. The tone is somewhat confrontational, aiming to hold a public figure accountable while dismissing anonymous participants. The statement touches upon principles of constructive criticism, respect, and responsible use of influence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to hold a public figure accountable, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by promoting responsibility. However, the dismissive tone towards anonymous participants could be seen as harmful. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy of others by not engaging with anonymous users, but the dismissive tone could be seen as lacking respect for their dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and accountability in scientific discourse, which aligns with promoting empathy and compassion. However, the confrontational tone may undermine this. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by proposing a bet to hold someone accountable, but the dismissive tone towards anonymous users could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to promote accountability in scientific predictions, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]