Gary Marcus

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -1
6/20/2024, 8:41:49 PM
X
In reply to:
Shameer Mulji
@shameermulji
路
149d
@GaryMarcus How about Professor Geoffrey Hinton? He's a strong believer that digital intelligence will surpass human intelligence
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
149d
馃し鈥嶁檪锔廔 have invited most of the major LLM enthusiasts from Musk to Kurzweil to Altman to debate; not one has had the nerve.
Christian Contemplation is the Bee鈥檚 Knees
@JoshBranscomb
路
149d
@GaryMarcus @lexfridman Anyone aware of recent, public, recorded debates on what LLMs will likely achieve? I'm not looking for safety debates. I'm looking for debates as to LLM capability, now and going forward.

The statement 'Yep he has also been invited multiple time by many people; also chicken' is a response in a conversation about the willingness of experts to debate the future capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The tone of the statement is dismissive and slightly mocking, particularly with the use of the word 'chicken,' which implies cowardice. This does not contribute constructively to the discourse and can be seen as a personal attack rather than a substantive engagement with the topic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses a derogatory term ('chicken') which can be harmful and disrespectful.聽[-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others; calling someone 'chicken' is a form of cyberbullying and harassment.聽[-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack rather than addressing the topic at hand.聽[-2]