In reply to:
Alexander Gambarian
@gambarian
·
148d
James
@AwokeKnowing
·
148d
The statement engages in a technical discussion about the capabilities and development timeline of GPT-4, contributing to the broader debate on the progress and potential of large language models (LLMs). The tone is informative and aims to clarify a point about the multimodal capabilities of GPT-4.
- The statement strives to do no harm and is focused on providing factual information about GPT-4's capabilities and training timeline. It does not engage in any harmful rhetoric or personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing specific information about GPT-4's multimodal capabilities and training timeline, which can help clarify misconceptions in the ongoing debate. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point in the conversation without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the technical aspects of the discussion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.