The statement and the preceding conversation involve a public debate about the future of AI and the behavior of a public figure in response to criticism. The tone is somewhat confrontational and involves personal grievances about being blocked on social media, which detracts from the substantive discussion about AI.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but does contribute to a negative tone in the discourse.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects privacy but does not fully respect the dignity of the individuals involved, as it publicly calls out the blocking behavior.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it focuses on a personal grievance rather than the substantive issue of AI development.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it focuses on a personal attack related to being blocked rather than addressing the AI debate constructively.
[-2]