The statement questions the media coverage of Jill Stein's presence on ballots compared to RFK, specifically in the context of debate participation. It implies a critique of media priorities and possibly the political process.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a critique rather than an attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by highlighting a perceived inconsistency in media coverage, though it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of media practices without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to question media practices. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.