Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
123d
The statement criticizes CNN for alleged collusion with the DNC and GOP, accusing the network of corporate election interference and advocating for the inclusion of all candidates in debates. The tone is accusatory and confrontational, aiming to highlight perceived unfairness in media coverage and debate inclusion.
- The statement aims to highlight perceived harm caused by media bias, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by advocating for fair representation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by advocating for the inclusion of all candidates, which can be seen as promoting a more democratic process. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of CNN and the debate process, though the accusatory tone could be seen as bordering on personal attacks against the network. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for what it perceives as a fairer electoral process, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by expressing a viewpoint on media and electoral fairness, though the accusatory tone could be seen as undermining responsible discourse.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.