The statement suggests that a lawyer believes Judge Cannon should recuse herself from a case, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue related to judicial impartiality. The statement also includes a link to a video for further context.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a professional opinion about judicial conduct. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a professional opinion on a public issue, potentially fostering empathy and compassion for fair judicial processes. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting recusal, which is a legitimate legal opinion, and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing a public concern with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.