Gary Marcus

Rank 33 of 47

Score -15

@sambhavgupta6 and as I suspected the Y-axis doesn’t start at zero, and we simply don’t have data back to GPT-2. My hunch is that most of the action was from GPT-2 to GPT-4….

6/22/2024, 3:59:29 PM

In reply to:

Sambhav Gupta

@sambhavgupta6

138d

@GaryMarcus Here’s the original

I actually thought everyone on X has already seen this complete graph since it was everywhere

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

138d

Reward for anyone who can find the source of this graph and plot it with reasonable accuracy back to the original GPT in 2018.

My guess is that 2024 will look like a tiny blip in that context.

Sambhav Gupta

@sambhavgupta6

140d

@GregKamradt maybe GPT5 is not that impressive as we imagine it to be

The statement engages in a technical discussion about the accuracy and completeness of a graph depicting AI model capabilities over time. It critiques the graph for not starting the Y-axis at zero and for lacking data on earlier models, specifically GPT-2. The tone is analytical and aims to clarify the data representation in the graph.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm and focuses on a factual critique of the graph, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by pointing out potential issues with the graph's data representation, which can help others interpret the graph more accurately. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the graph's shortcomings without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]