In reply to:
Taelin
@VictorTaelin
·
137d
The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the future of artificial intelligence, a significant public issue. The tone is professional and informative, aiming to contribute to the ongoing debate about the development and potential of AI technologies.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. It is a professional and respectful contribution to the discussion. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a link to a detailed essay, which can help others gain a deeper insight into the topic. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific question and providing a thoughtful response without personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's influence to contribute positively to the discourse on AI, which is a significant societal issue. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by sharing informed opinions and resources. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.