The statement and accompanying image are highly emotive and appear to criticize the actions of Israel in a specific incident. The use of the term 'angel' to describe the child in the image and the quotation marks around 'self defense' suggest a strong bias and a questioning of the justification for the actions taken. The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a contentious and sensitive issue related to conflict and violence.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by potentially inflaming tensions and emotions around an already sensitive issue. The language used is accusatory and does not promote a balanced or nuanced understanding of the situation. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the child by not revealing personal details, but the use of the child's image in a political context could be seen as exploitative. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is heavily biased and does not encourage constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and instead uses emotionally charged language that could be seen as a personal attack on the actions of Israel. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.