In reply to:
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the nature of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically addressing their deterministic versus stochastic characteristics. This is a technical and public issue relevant to the field of artificial intelligence and machine learning, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not cause harm with words and actions. It is a technical rebuttal and does not contain any harmful language or intent. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a nuanced explanation of how context and input variations affect LLM outputs. It aims to clarify a technical point, which can foster better comprehension among the audience. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a specific point made by @burkov without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the technical aspects of the discussion. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.