Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement critiques the effectiveness of federal job training programs, suggesting that they fail to prepare workers for meaningful careers. It engages with a public issue—workforce development and economic policy—making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critique of policy rather than individuals, so it aligns with this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting the shortcomings of job training programs. It encourages readers to consider the practical outcomes of such policies, aligning with this principle. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a policy rather than personal attacks, adhering to this principle. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By critiquing federal job training programs, the statement uses its influence to potentially advocate for better policies, aligning with this principle. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue, aligning with this principle. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.