The statement presents a critique of contemporary culture, suggesting that it penalizes excellence and embraces victimhood. It calls for a return to a more primal, 'inner animal spirit' that is claimed to have made America great in the past. The tone is provocative and somewhat confrontational, aiming to challenge current societal norms.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but its confrontational tone could be seen as divisive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make broad generalizations that could be interpreted as dismissive of certain groups.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; rather, it seems to promote a return to a more aggressive or competitive mindset. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes broad, sweeping claims without engaging with specific arguments or evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for a particular viewpoint, but it is debatable whether this viewpoint contributes to the betterment of society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but could be seen as using its platform in a polarizing manner.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.