Rashida Tlaib

The statement 'I agree' in response to a tweet about alleged Israeli government-funded efforts to influence American public opinion and policy does constitute public discourse. It engages with a substantive public issue concerning international relations, legal compliance, and public policy.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but aligns with a call for investigation, which could be seen as a responsible action. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement is neutral and does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It aligns with constructive dialogue by supporting an investigation. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to call for accountability, which can be seen as an effort for societal betterment. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by supporting a call for legal investigation. [+1]