Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a public issue, specifically the alleged firing of an individual for displaying a political sign, which touches on freedom of expression and workplace rights. The tone is accusatory and aims to highlight perceived injustice, potentially mobilizing public opinion against Lyft's actions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could incite negative reactions towards Lyft, which may indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individual involved but could be seen as targeting Lyft, potentially leading to harassment of the company. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on highlighting an alleged injustice. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is accusatory and does not invite discussion or resolution. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to bring attention to a perceived injustice, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for freedom of expression. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by highlighting an issue related to freedom of expression, but it could be argued that it does not use the platform responsibly by potentially inciting negative reactions.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.