In reply to:
Igor Kurganov
@IgorKurganov
·
133d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
133d
The statement engages in a discussion about the progress and potential of large language models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, in the context of technological advancements and investments. It questions the rate of improvement and the associated costs, contributing to a broader debate on the efficiency and future of AI development.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive debate about technological progress. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning and seeking clarification on the progress of LLMs, which can lead to a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the claims made about the future improvements of LLMs without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to discuss a significant societal issue, namely the development and impact of AI technology. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.