The statement engages in a public discourse about the quality and security of code, which is a relevant issue in the field of technology and artificial intelligence. The tone is analytical and somewhat skeptical, aiming to provide a counterpoint to the optimistic view expressed by Igor Kurganov.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not cause harm and is focused on discussing the quality and security of code, which is a legitimate concern.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes understanding by bringing up studies that show a decrease in code quality and security, encouraging a more nuanced discussion.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the optimistic view and asking for evidence, without resorting to personal attacks.
[+1]