Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement by the user addresses a public issue related to media practices and the accessibility of information, particularly focusing on CNN's restrictions on independent journalists livestreaming a debate. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to highlight perceived hypocrisy and financial motivations of a major news network.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a critical tone that could be seen as provocative.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize a public entity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it leans towards a personal attack on CNN's integrity and motivations. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to raise a public issue, though the tone could be more responsible and constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.