In reply to:
Steppenwulf
@PalmsBurnt
·
129d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
129d
Pete Skomoroch
@peteskomoroch
·
129d
The statement engages in a public discourse about the qualifications and credibility of individuals involved in AI policy-making. The tone is dismissive and critical, focusing on the need for substantive arguments rather than personal attacks.
- The statement aims to shift the conversation towards substantive arguments, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. However, the dismissive tone and eye-rolling emoji could be seen as condescending, which might cause harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks, but the dismissive tone could be perceived as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By calling for actual arguments, the statement promotes understanding and constructive dialogue, aligning with the principle of using words to promote empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by asking for substantive arguments, but the dismissive tone and emoji could be seen as a minor personal attack, which detracts from constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.