The statement and accompanying image discuss the frequency and intensity of communications between government defendants and platforms, suggesting that such communications had subsided by 2022. This analysis touches on the principles of government behavior, legal interpretations, and public concern about government-induced content moderation.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be interpreted as downplaying the significance of government actions, which might indirectly cause concern.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals involved, focusing on the actions of government entities rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by providing context about the frequency of government communications, but it might also be seen as dismissive of concerns about government overreach.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the actions of government entities. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss a significant issue related to government behavior and content moderation, which is relevant to public discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by discussing a legal and governmental issue, but its tone might be seen as minimizing the concerns about government-induced content moderation.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.